VintageIron created the topic: Tahoe National Forest
The MVUM for Tahoe National Forest has been published officially closing many routes. There is a lawsuit against Tahoe National Forest for not following NEPA process. This group can use our help Here is their press release:
In an effort to discourage OHV groups from filing lawsuits against the Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest and the
USDA levied outrageous and unreasonable fees against the groups for “copies” of the Administrative Record delivered to the FederalDistrict Court.
Background: In an effort to reverse over 800 miles of illegal road closures in the Tahoe National Forest's 2009 Travel Management decision, the Friends of Tahoe Forest Access et al, sought the counsel of the Pacific Legal Foundation. By what some would call a miracle, this legal powerhouse, a watchdog of the little guy, agreed to take the case.
Completely outrageous charges for a very simple Summary Judgment were levied against Friends of Tahoe Forest Access (FoTFA),Friends of Greenhorn (FOG), Nevada County Woods Riders (NCWR), Grass Valley 4Wheel Drive Club (GV4WDC), WeBilt 4WD Club(WB4WDC), High Sierra Motorcycle Club (HSMC) and 2 individuals in the case brought by the Pacific Legal Foundation last month.
When the bloated invoices were protested by Pacific Legal Foundations Attorney Ted Hadzi-Antich, Judge Mendez sided with the FederalGovernment and upheld the charges levied against the OHV groups in the amount of $14,875.00. Judge Mendez stated in the appealdenial that it is legal to bill for direct costs.
The charges included $275.00 in fees and over $14,600.00 in printing costs (invoices attached). Pacific Legal Foundation charged it's clients only $562.00 for only the relevant information required to prepare for the case. The Justice department found it necessary to not only print one entire copy of the Administrative Record, but a second electronic copy was created and delivered to Judge Mendez of the Federal District Court. They are required to provide only one digitized copy to the court, instead they chose to produce 2 - Charging the groups for copies is discretionary. So the message is clear.
In preparatory meetings prior to filing the suit in Federal District Court, the question was posed by the Plaintiffs to Pacific Legal Foundation's counsel, if it were possible that the Federal Government would bill us for legal expenses, the answer was it was within the rights of the government to bill for expenses, but that in the history of these types of legal battles, it was very rare, highly unlikely, and had never happened in Mr. Hadzi-Antich's 30+ year legal history.
The case has now been appealed to the 9th circuit Court of Appeals. On May 19th, 2014, Pacific Legal Foundation moved one step closer to seeing this case “all the way through to the Supreme Court”.
To our fellow off roading public, the groups above do not have the means to cover this egregious expense, and are asking that we reach out to those who utilize roads and trails in the Tahoe National Forest to do what they can to help us cover this cost. It is important that we not be discouraged by this “message”, and that we send our own message - that the US Forest Service cannot deter us from taking legal action in the future.